Open Access Journal

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

Open Access Journal

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

Review of Contributor’s Categories and their Motivations for Open Street Map

Author : Pawan Verma 1 Sukhjit Singh Sehra 2 Kapil Sharma 3

Date of Publication :7th June 2016

Abstract: Open Street Map(OSM) is a global map data that is collected by the volunteers who are involved with OSM project while roaming all around the world. It is a geographic data which describes the feature of a real world object. This study investigates the various OSM data elements, OSM editing tools, motivation factors in contribution, data quality parameters and types of contributors in OSM project. As Web 2.0, Volunteered Geographic information(VGI) and Global Positioning System(GPS) devices are introduced, any registered user of OSM can create and edit the OSM data globally. Basically, there are three tools JOSM, Potlatch 2 and iD that are used to contribute to OSM. As the number of contributors are rising, data quality of geographic data is also improving. There are various motivation factors like knowledge about area where contributor lives which compels the contributors to contribute more and more about that area. Some classification rules are used to categorize the user based on the quantity and quality of data.

Reference :

    1. ―About OSM,‖ (accessed on 30 April 2016). [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open Street Map
    2. M. Haklay and P. Weber, ―Open Street Map: Usergenerated street maps,‖ Pervasive Computing, IEEE, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 12–18, 2008
    3. M. F. Goodchild, ―Citizens as sensors: web 2.0 and the volunteering of geographic information,‖ GeoFocus, vol. 7, pp. 8–10, 2007.
    4. ——, ―Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography,‖ GeoJournal, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 211–221, 2007.
    5. P. Neis and A. Zipf, ―Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project — the case of Open Street Map,‖ ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 146–165, jul 2012.
    6. ―OSM Statistics,‖ (accessed on 27 May 2016). [Online]. Available: http://osmstats.neis-one.org/
    7. ―OSM Data Elements,‖ (accessed on 30 April 2016). [Online]. Available: http://wiki.Open Street Map.org/wiki/ Elements
    8. ―OSM Editors,‖ (accessed on May 28 2016). [Online]. Available: http://wiki.Open Street Map.org/wiki/Editors
    9. M. Haklay, S. Basiouka, V. Antoniou, and A. Ather, ―How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? the validity of linus law to volunteered geographic information,‖ The Cartographic Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 315–322, 2010
    10. v. P. Oort, ―Spatial data quality: from description to application,‖ Wageningen Universiteit, 2006.
    11. N. R. Budhathoki, ―Participants’ motivations to contribute geographic information in an online community,‖ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, 2010.
    12. ―Web 2.0,‖ (accessed on 30 April 2016). [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web 2.0
    13. ―Crowdsourced Map Data,‖ (accesed on 30 April 2016). [Online]. Available: http://www.imapbuilder.net/interactive-map-samples/ crowdsourced-map-example.php
    14. Volunteered Geographic Information,‖ (accessed on 30 April 2016). [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Volunteered geographic information
    15. S. Elwood, M. F. Goodchild, and D. Z. Sui, ―Researchingvolunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice,‖ Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 571–590, may 2012.
    16. V. Antoniou, M. Haklay, and J. Morley, ―A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of web 2.0 geoapplications: the case of Open Street Map,‖ in the 18th GISRUK Conference, London, UK, 2010, pp. 197–201.
    17. J. J. Arsanjani, C. Barron, M. Bakillah, and M. Helbich, ―Assessing the quality of Open Street Map contributors together with their contributions,‖ in Proceedings of the AGILE, 2013.
    18. P. Neis, D. Zielstra, and A. Zipf, ―Comparison of volunteered geographic information data contributions and community development for selected world regions,‖ Future Internet, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 282–300, 2013
    19. ―OSM Changeset,‖ (accessed on 30 April 2016). [Online]. Available: http://wiki.Open Street Map.org/wiki/ Changeset
    20. D. J. Coleman, Y. Georgiadou, J. Labonte et al., ―Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of produsers,‖ International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 332– 358, 2009.
    21. P. Neis, ―Mapper Type,‖ (accessed on 30 April 2016). [Online]. Available: http://neis-one.org/2012/01/ what-typeof-mapper-are-you/

Recent Article